HFpEF Pharmacotherapy: What a Network Meta-analysis Compared
Study at a glance
- Publication type: Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials
- What it examined: This network meta-analysis compared established and emerging pharmacotherapies evaluated in randomised trials of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).
- Key point: The review considered ACE inhibitors, ARBs, beta blockers, MRAs, digoxin, ARNIs, SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, nitrates and nitrites. Its prespecified outcomes included cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalisation, mortality, worsening events, functional capacity, quality of life and NT-proBNP.
Why it matters
A comparative evidence review helps place treatments in context, but it does not replace the eligibility criteria, safety monitoring and shared decision-making needed for an individual patient.
Source
Comparative effectiveness of pharmacotherapy for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. PMID: 41588709. View the PubMed record.
This educational summary is based on the cited publication and is not medical advice. Clinical decisions should be made with an appropriately qualified healthcare professional.

Previous Post
Dapagliflozin Started During Heart Failure Hospitalisation: DAPA ACT HF-TIMI 68
Next Post
Biomarker-Guided Heart Failure Management: Why Certainty of Evidence Matters

